Hallows’ Eve: Betrayal of the Martyrs & Betrayal of Christ

St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre when the RCC put to death some 30,000-70,000 Protestants who denied the authority of the papacy in 1572.

St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre when the RCC put to death some 30,000-70,000 Protestants who denied the authority of the papacy in 1572.

In just over a week, Americans will be participating in the fourth most popular holiday, Halloween. Of course, the holiday didn’t always mean “trick or treating,” costumes, and children intoxicated with candy. We’ve come quite far from the original intent of the holiday (what holiday hasn’t?), which, in name, calls to remembrance the many saints who have been martyred for the cause of Christ (hallow’d + eve = Halloween). That’s why in my last post, I encouraged you to remember the martyrs in order that you may be encouraged by them and be strengthened by their faith on the holiday that originally intended to encourage us to do that very thing.

But sadly, many Christians haven’t just forgotten the martyrs. They’ve betrayed them and the doctrines they fought and died for. And in so doing, they’ve also betrayed the Author of those doctrines, and they’ve betrayed Christ by extending fellowship to a religion that is explicitly anti-Christ.

I was shocked (though not surprised) when LifeWay Research Group conducted a survey of over 1000 Protestant and Evangelical pastors regarding their positions on the Pope and Roman Catholicism. The results came came in just last month in an article published by Christianity Today, From Antichrist to Brother in Christ: How Protestant Pastors View the Pope.

Those results were not good.

Alarmingly, nearly 60% of evangelical pastors now believe that the Pope is a Christian. Almost 20% don’t know. Not only that, but 92% of evangelical pastors seem to think that you can be a Roman Catholic and be a true born-again Christian (I think the verb “be” is crucial to the discussion here. It is a state of being verb, so as to say that you can indefinitely remain in Roman Catholicism and participate in its practices. If you want just one example of why true Christians can’t do that, click here).

calvin and hobbes ignoranceAnd you can’t make the argument that they’re just ignorant of what Roman Catholicism teaches. These are the pastors. They know better. They know what Catholicism is and they know what biblical Christianity is. In other words, they can’t say, “I was mistaken, I thought Roman Catholicism taught justification by faith alone.” The religion is completely apostate. Completely – and it’s just as condemning as every other false religion like Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, or even Atheism (which I also count as a religion of its own). In fact, I think it’s even more dangerous because to the undiscerning eye, it looks like Christianity. It doesn’t help of course when they claim to be Christians.

So, you know what that survey tells me? About 60% of evangelical pastors (assuming a high statistical accuracy) are confused about the Gospel. Actually, I should say 80%, because I’m pretty uneasy about that extra 20% who said they didn’t know if the Pope was a Christian. Why don’t they know? What’s to be confused about? This isn’t complicated. That may sound harsh, but I don’t know how we can make other conclusion.

But to say the least, you can bet that if 60-80% of today’s pastors are confused about the Gospel, that means their congregations are even more confused. We have come far from the Protestant Reformation, which made it really easy for us to understand the difference between what the Bible says, and what Roman Catholicism particularly says. Hence the 5 Solas of the Reformation

There is little doubt that the Reformers who were willing to give their lives for the doctrine of Sola Fide (justification by faith alone) would be rolling over in their graves if they knew how readily many Christians will affirm join in fellowship with today’s Roman Catholics. It was quite clear to them how far the Catholic Church had deviated from biblical truth and the Gospel. In fact, even the Catholic Church was aware of this, but to preserve its power, they outlawed the publication of the Bible in the public’s spoken language everywhere they could. They could not allow the general public to read the Scriptures for themselves, so they even chained the Bibles to the church pulpit to ensure no one (even the priests) could take them home to study for themselves. Ironically, this was under the guise of preventing heresy. In reality, it was all about the preservation of it.

What’s worse is that many Christians will vehemently defend friends and loved ones who belong to the Roman Catholic Church, and will often angrily oppose the very notion that Catholicism is in direct opposition to the Gospel. Others will praise the Pope for popularizing Christianity throughout the world by his good works. The problem is, the Pope only popularizes hypocrisy. They are no different than what Jesus condemned the Pharisees for.

This people honors Me with their lips,

But their heart is far away from Me.
But in vain do they worship Me,
Teaching as doctrines the precepts of men…

[They] are experts at setting aside the commandment of God in order to keep [their] tradition.

(Mark 7:6-9)

So why so much confusion?

It was in 1545-57 that the Roman Catholic Church anathematized any who would proclaim that salvation is by faith alone (the Protestant Reformers) at the Council of Trent. It was at this point that the term “Catholic” really took on a new meaning. Before this (and yes, this is a somewhat simplistic historical overview), the “catholic church” simply meant the “universal,” “orthodox,” “true,” or “global” church. Gradually, the churches between the East and the West divided, and the western church set its headquarters in Rome.

TrentThrough time, “the” church morphed into “The Church,” and while there was much corruption and false teaching in the Catholic Church by the 1500’s (ever hear of the pornocracy of the 10th century? It was an era which was markedly characterized by harlotry in the Vatican) the Council of Trent marked when the RCC became officially heretical. Before that point, even Martin Luther believed that there was the possibility for the Church to return to biblical orthodoxy, but now there was no question. The RCC forever deserted the faith (RC doctrine, according to them, is infallible and cannot be overturned). Even when Luther nailed his 95 Thesis to the All Saints’ Church in Wittenberg on October 31, 1517 (Reformation Day), he did so in Latin. Why? The general public could only read German. Only the trained clergy would be able to read his protests – because Luther initially believed that there could be reform from within the church. It quickly became obvious that this wasn’t the case.

But how is it that so many people could blindly follow an apostate religion? The answer, as the RCC knew, was through ignorance. If the public couldn’t read the Bible, the public would have to depend on what the “Church” told them the Bible said. They’d be ignorant. In fact, that’s what infuriated Tyndale himself, which prompted him to dedicate his life to the translation of the Bible from the original Hebrew and Greek into the English language. Tyndale was frustrated that he had to study RC theology, but couldn’t so much as look at a Bible until after he had been indoctrinated with their heresies for 8 or 9 years (that is quite telling, and self-condemning for the RCC. It is to say that you could not possibly come to RC doctrine by simply reading the Scriptures). In that regard, little has changed, if anything has changed at all.

Of course, Catholics today can readily get their hands on a Bible in their own language, so the Catholic Church preys on its people in a different way.

They play on people’s laziness, and depravity. Depravity will keep someone from reading the Scriptures on their own unless the Holy Spirit is prompting them to do so. So, if the RCC doesn’t encourage their congregations to read the Scriptures, they know their congregations won’t (same reason why RC churches don’t have pulpits). But, the RCC doesn’t keep people ignorant regarding what they teach. In fact, to become a member of the RCC, you must go through a series of examinations, either through Confirmation or RCIA classes, that ensure you have a relatively comprehensive understanding of the core tenants of Roman Catholicism. So, members of the RCC know what the Catholic Church teaches, just not what Scripture teaches. That’s why you hear many stories of Roman Catholics (like Martin Luther, William Tyndale, and John Calvin) getting saved, simply by reading the Scriptures. They quickly came to understand that what the RCC teaches, and what the Bible teaches, are completely different gospels.

But today’s Evangelicals are also ignorant, and ignorance is the reason that many Christians believe Roman Catholics are fellow believers in the same Gospel. We can probably trace much of today’s confusion about Catholicism to an event in 1983, though confusion certainly existed well before that. Even in the earliest years of the Billy Graham Crusades, Graham shared the pulpit with Catholic bishops and even referred new “converts” to RC churches and counselors. Ecumenical thinking had already infiltrated many of the seminaries in the United States who adopted the liberal “scholasticism” of the European schools. But in 1983, a group of Lutheran and Catholic theologians announced that they had “come to agreement on justification.”

But really, no such agreement occurred. The “bilateral talks” that produced a document called “Lutherans and Catholics in Dialogue” in 1985 was unofficial and wasn’t even accepted by Rome, in spite of all the media attention it got. Even so, the “Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification” was an official follow-up, because of so-called “insights of recent biblical studies” referring to the aforementioned dialogue.1 Truthfully, all that was produced was a document that said, in so many words, “we’ll say we agree even though we’ve said we won’t agree, and without changing what we said about not agreeing.” If you’re confused by that, so am I, because what happened was the Lutherans and Catholics came together and produced an official document that said words don’t really mean what they say, and we can say we agree even though our doctrinal statements say we disagree. So really, there was no agreement.

All that happened was that vernacular was simply modified, leading many to believe that the Catholic Church was affirming the evangelical doctrine of justification (the matter of justification was a main issue in that document). Nothing could be further from the truth! All it did was affirm what Catholics already believed about justification, and the RCC never rescinded what it canonized in the Council of Trent.

Bottome line: evaluate Roman Catholicism under the scrutiny of God’s Word (like you should for everything – AKA sola scriptura). It is important to know what they believe compared what the Scriptures reveal about salvation. We must be prepared and equipped to evangelize our Catholic friends and families. Understand, they are not our co-laborers; they are not our brothers and sisters. They are our mission field. We must be able to expose the heresy and error of their system, and offer to them the only hope found in Christ.

Roman Catholicism - RC Sproul